← Great Brittania / JSJowett Blogs
Charles I · Duke of Buckingham · English Civil War · Cromwell · J.S. Jowett

King Charles, the Commonwealth
& the Duke of Buckingham

Petition of Right · Eleven Years' Tyranny · Archbishop Laud · Edgehill · 190,000 Dead
The Impeachment of Buckingham — & the Cádiz Disaster

In 1627 British Parliament opened impeachment proceedings against George Villiers, the Duke of Buckingham, to which the King, Charles I, responded in turn by dissolving his Parliament. As Charles and George had travelled together and incognito to Spain in February 1623, to try to reach agreement on the long-pending Spanish match; they were long since friends, and Charles had just placed him in command of the English forces for a French relief task force mission at the siege of La Rochelle. In fact Charles and the Duke of Buckingham had assumed together de facto control of the Kingdom by 1624 when King James I was growing ill. In May 1626 more so, Charles had nominated his friend and ally the Duke of Buckingham as Chancellor of Cambridge University, appeasing his disastrous military advances made against Spain.

The Cádiz Expedition — What They Don't Teach in School

The plan was to seize the main Spanish port at Cádiz and burn the fleet in its harbour. What actually happened: the militia called off the attack themselves, camped down in the harbour's warehouse district, and got drunk instead. The expedition returned to England having accomplished nothing except the consumption of a significant quantity of Spanish wine. Buckingham was given Cambridge University. Charles dissolved Parliament when they pointed this out.

When two members of parliament Dudley Digges and Sir John Eliot, who had spoken against the Duke of Buckingham were arrested for the condemnation, the Commons became outraged, and on 12 June 1626, the Commons launched a direct protestation:

The Commons' Protestation · 12 June 1626
"We protest before your Majesty and the whole world that until this great person be removed from intermeddling with the great affairs of state, we are out of hope of any good success; and do fear that any money we shall or can give will, through his misemployment, be turned rather to the hurt and prejudice of this your kingdom than otherwise, as by lamentable experience we have found those large supplies formerly and lately given."
— House of Commons, addressed to Charles I, 12 June 1626
The Eleven Years' Tyranny — Rule Without Parliament

Without parliament Charles had left himself unable to raise any money. Charles thus assembled a puppet parliament in 1628 drawing up the Petition of Right, and on referral from the Magna Carta. In his "personal rule of Charles I", or the "Eleven Years' Tyranny" ruling the English nation from his coffers; Charles made peace with France and Spain, effectively ending England's involvement in the Thirty Years' War (to salvage finances). He introduced a monetary tax additionally, exploiting a naval war-scare in 1635 to gain funding (in which many prominent British businessmen were fined for refusing to pay).

These measures were followed with proper religious reformation which would though tip the balance unfavorably. Charles believed in High Anglicanism, a sacramental version of the Church of England, theologically based upon Arminianism, a creed shared with his main political advisor, Archbishop William Laud. In 1633, firstly Charles appointed Laud as Archbishop of Canterbury, of which the Puritans claimed was a attempt towards Catholicism (and a return). While vying for a uniform Church throughout Britain and Scotland in fact, this was non-gratis and a riot broke out in Edinburgh following, after he introduced a High Anglican version of the English Book of Common Prayer in mid-1637. The mainstream response to the objections formed into Royal policy in the National Covenant which rejected all innovations not first having been tested by free parliaments and general assemblies of the church.

The militant responses increased until King Charles I was defeated losing Newcastle to the Scots — after which he absconded the English religious pressure on Scotland and paid the Scots' war-expenses for good return.

The militant responses increased until King Charles I was defeated losing Newcastle to the Scots, after which he absconded the English religious pressure on Scotland and paid the Scots' war-expenses for good return. Short lived however, Charles' hand had been forced and to break the Scottish rebelliousness, and the treaty he attacked them forthrightly in Berwick. In turn the Scots invaded England, occupying Northumberland and Durham.

Strafford, Ireland & the Irreparable Rift

Meanwhile, Charles' chief advisor Thomas Wentworth, 1st Viscount Wentworth, had risen to the role of Lord Deputy of Ireland in 1632 and brought in much-needed revenue for Charles by persuading the Irish Catholic gentry to pay new taxes in return for promised religious concessions (who he made the Earl of Strafford duly). However when Charles tried again to reform parliament, granting a new autonomy in the process, the nobles agenda provided contrary to Charles' military circumstance. They firstly condemned Wentworth, the accomplished financer to Charles, to death, who was executed; a order which Charles himself signed out of fear for his wellbeing. As the parliamentarians continued to suspect Charles of wanting to impose episcopalianism and unfettered Royal rule by military force the situation turned grim. The Irish Catholics, fearing a resurgence from the Protestants, rebelled and rumor's that the King supported the Irish, and was sympathetic to Catholic rule (Spanish), led to a irreparable rift. Charles was unofficially denounced by the Parliamentarians but labelled in kind as their servant.

Civil War, Execution & the Commonwealth

Charles departed London in January 1642 and by 22 August had raised the Royal standard at Nottingham and followed into the first pitched battle, fought at Edgehill on 23 October 1642. He was imprisoned, subsequently at Hurst Castle at the end of 1648, and thereafter to Windsor Castle; where in January 1649, the Rump House of Commons indicted him. The Parliamentarian and Royalist 'Civil War' would continue after Charles was executed, in the initiated era of the 'old' English Commonwealth. He was succeeded by Charles II who returned from exile (after defeat by Oliver Cromwell at Worcester, and failure of his Republican model) on 23 May 1660, and was crowned in the ceremonial restoration of the monarchy on 23 April 1661; amending the gap left by Cromwell (Lord Protector and effective military dictator for near twenty years) and the 190,000 British killed in his war.

190,000 British killed in Cromwell's war — the deadliest conflict on British soil
11 years Charles I ruled without Parliament — the Eleven Years' Tyranny, 1629–1640
1628 Petition of Right — the first formal legal constraint on royal power since Magna Carta
Recommended Reading
Kevin Sharpe — The Personal Rule of Charles I (Yale University Press, 1992) Academic · Definitive
The monumental treatment — based on a decade of research across a vast range of manuscript and printed sources, the most significant contribution to the history of early Stuart government since Gardiner's four-volume classic work in 1877. Sharpe presents a revisionist case that the Personal Rule was not merely tyranny but a coherent programme of reform — a reading contested by many historians who find him too sympathetic to Charles. Demanding but essential: the book everything else argues with.
Blair Worden — The English Civil Wars 1640–1660 (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2009) Popular History
Described by the Literary Review as "straightforward, stimulating and a joy to read" — the best single-volume account for a reader who wants to understand why the English went to war with the Scots, with the Irish, and with each other, and how they ended up killing their king. Worden cuts through the bewildering shifting alliances and purges to the underlying question: what was actually at stake, and who knew it at the time?
Diane Purkiss — The English Civil War: A People's History (Harper Perennial, 2006) Popular History
Where Worden gives you the political architecture, Purkiss gives you the people living inside it. Drawing on letters, ballads, memoirs, and eyewitness accounts from foot soldiers and widows to witchfinders and Quakers, she reconstructs what it actually felt like to live through the war. The relationship between Cromwell and Charles I runs through the book as its central axis. Vivid and human in a way academic history rarely manages.
L.J. Reeve — Charles I and the Road to Personal Rule (Cambridge University Press, 1989) Academic
The specialist treatment of the critical 1626–29 period — precisely the years this post covers, from the impeachment of Buckingham through the Petition of Right to the dissolution that began the Eleven Years' Tyranny. Reeve charts the moment-by-moment breakdown of the relationship between Charles and Parliament with archival precision. The book that makes clear how deliberate, rather than accidental, Charles' choices were.
Richard Cust — The Forced Loan and English Politics 1626–28 (Oxford University Press, 1987) Academic
The definitive study of Charles' most constitutionally controversial peacetime revenue device — the forced loan that replaced parliamentary taxation during the Buckingham years and directly provoked the Petition of Right. Cust demonstrates that the forced loan was not merely a financial measure but a political test of loyalty that radically polarised the country before the Eleven Years even began. Essential context for understanding why Parliament was already furious before the Prayer Book riot in Edinburgh.
· · ·

Written by Jason Steven Jowett. Sourced from historical fact. This blog may not be reproduced in whole without the author's express permission. Copyright © 2024. greatbrittania.blogspot.com